Advertisement
CTAS vs DV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a StrongBuy and DV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- DV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- DV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTAS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while DV (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.
DV is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-0.65% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
@Packaged Software (+3.32% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CTAS | DV | CTAS / DV | |
| Capitalization | 69.7B | 6.02B | 1,158% |
| EBITDA | 2.34B | 138M | 1,699% |
| Gain YTD | 21.590 | -18.428 | -117% |
| P/E Ratio | 49.26 | 83.10 | 59% |
| Revenue | 9.19B | 573M | 1,605% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 310M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.87B | 86.4M | 3,318% |
CTAS | DV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DV's Valuation (73) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (89). This means that DV’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for DV (100). This means that CTAS’s stock grew significantly faster than DV’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's SMR Rating (24) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DV (84). This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DV’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as DV (54). This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to DV’s over the last 12 months.
DV's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (55). This means that DV’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
| CTAS | DV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FBL | 42.35 | 1.01 | +2.44% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | |||
| TOTR | 40.44 | 0.10 | +0.24% |
| T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF | |||
| RWL | 103.92 | -0.03 | -0.03% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | |||
| PVI | 24.82 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Invesco Floating Rate MunicipalIncomeETF | |||
| IROC | 49.36 | -0.07 | -0.13% |
| Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF | |||
CTAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| EXPO - CTAS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| DNB - CTAS | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VRSK - CTAS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ARLO - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| EFX - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
DV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DV has been loosely correlated with DLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DV jumps, then DLO could also see price increases.