Investors comparing CTAS and VRSK are effectively weighing two very different businesses that nonetheless share a common profile: high-margin, recurring-revenue franchises that sell "picks and shovels" to essential industries. Cintas rents and services uniforms, mats, and safety products through a massive route network, while Verisk supplies the data and analytical tools insurers use to underwrite and settle claims. This stock comparison is most relevant to investors evaluating relative performance, market positioning, and the trade-off between a defensive industrial compounder and an asset-light data platform.
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is a leader in uniform rental and facility services, complemented by first aid and safety products and fire protection services. Its route-based delivery model and high customer retention create predictable, subscription-like revenue across North America.
In recent market activity, CTAS has traded near the higher portion of its 52-week range, with a market capitalization of roughly $84 billion and a price-to-earnings ratio in the low-40s. Its most recently reported quarterly results showed revenue growing about 9% year over year, with earnings per share (EPS) modestly ahead of consensus, and management raised its full-year outlook. Sentiment has been supported by record customer retention, disciplined pricing, and early cross-selling gains, as well as digital investments in routing and customer platforms.
A notable catalyst in recent weeks is Cintas's agreement to acquire rival UniFirst, a transaction that requires Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approval. This deal could reshape the uniform rental industry's competitive landscape and has drawn increased attention to CTAS's strategic direction.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) provides predictive analytics and decision-support solutions to the insurance industry, spanning underwriting, rating, claims, catastrophe modeling, and anti-fraud tools. Its subscription-heavy model and proprietary datasets give it entrenched relationships with insurers and reinsurers.
In recent months, VRSK has traded in a lower range after a period of softer share-price performance. Its most recent fiscal-year results showed revenue rising roughly 6–7% on an organic constant currency (OCC) basis, with adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins above 55%. However, near-term growth has been tempered by historically low severe-weather activity, which reduces demand for transactional claims and property-estimating volumes, and by the loss of a government contract.
Verisk has been actively reshaping its portfolio: it divested its Verisk Marketing Solutions business and terminated a planned acquisition after an extended FTC review. At the same time, it announced a $1.5 billion accelerated share repurchase (ASR) and an 11% dividend increase, while continuing to roll out AI-enabled products such as XactGen across its claims and underwriting workflows.
Tickeron maintains a curated list of Trending AI Robots, a selection drawn from a much larger library of AI-powered trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of different tickers. Because not every bot suits every market, only those demonstrating the strongest fit for current conditions earn a place in this section. These bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance records, and ticker universes, giving traders the ability to compare statistics side by side and identify approaches aligned with their own objectives and risk tolerance. If you are evaluating a stock comparison like CTAS versus VRSK, reviewing the Trending AI Robots can help you see how systematic, data-driven strategies are currently positioning across the market.
The core contrast between these two names lies in their business models and growth drivers. Cintas generates revenue through physical route operations, capitalizing on employment trends, new customer acquisition, and cross-selling across uniforms, first aid, and fire protection. Its momentum tends to be steady and defensive, supported by sticky contracts and high retention. Verisk, by contrast, is an asset-light software and data business with far higher margins and strong cash conversion, but its growth is more cyclical—tied to insurance premium volumes, catastrophe activity, and adoption of new analytics products.
Risk profiles also differ. Cintas faces execution and regulatory risk around its UniFirst acquisition, alongside sensitivity to employment levels. Verisk faces regulatory scrutiny on deals, weather-driven volatility in transactional revenue, and competitive questions around emerging AI-native startups. On the sentiment front, Cintas has enjoyed more consistent investor confidence in recent weeks, while Verisk's narrative has been more mixed as it navigates portfolio transitions and a softer near-term outlook.
From a market positioning standpoint, both are large-cap, quality franchises, but Cintas trades at a premium multiple reflecting steadier growth, whereas Verisk offers a higher-margin, more cash-generative model at a comparatively lower valuation after its recent repricing.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CTAS in the current environment. Cintas demonstrates stronger trend consistency, resilient top-line growth, and clearer near-term catalysts, while its share price has held nearer the top of its range. Verisk retains a structurally attractive, high-margin model and a more aggressive capital-return program, but its softer transactional trends and ongoing portfolio transition introduce greater near-term uncertainty. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive: should insurance-cycle headwinds ease and AI adoption accelerate, the relative positioning could shift in Verisk's favor.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CTAS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 25 of 39 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CTAS as a result. In 50 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The 10-day moving average for CTAS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 8 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Following a +1.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CTAS advanced for three days, in 197 of 341 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 164 of 312 cases where CTAS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 53%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CTAS moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 12 of the 37 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 32%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 23 of 64 cases where CTAS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 36%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CTAS turned negative on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 15 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 36%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CTAS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 38%.
CTAS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. CTAS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (17.284) is normal, around the industry mean (5.887). P/E Ratio (44.740) is within average values for comparable stocks, (33.618). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.144) is also within normal values, averaging (1.946). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.025) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (7.194) is also within normal values, averaging (9.907).
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for VRSK turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where VRSK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on VRSK as a result. In 42 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 51%.
VRSK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for VRSK crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 6 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 35%.
Following a +7.34% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VRSK advanced for three days, in 147 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 47%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 142 of 276 cases where VRSK Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 51%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for VRSK moved out of overbought territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 36 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 21 of the 36 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 58%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 35 of 62 cases where VRSK's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VRSK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
VRSK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. VRSK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 52 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-22.396) is normal, around the industry mean (13.131). P/E Ratio (31.427) is within average values for comparable stocks, (49.500). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.412) is also within normal values, averaging (2.814). Dividend Yield (0.010) settles around the average of (0.026) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (7.899) is also within normal values, averaging (26.240).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. VRSK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
CTAS | VRSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VRSK's Valuation (52) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTAS (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRSK (98) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew significantly faster than VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's SMR Rating (8) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (26) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (42) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (50) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CTAS | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 7 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 2 days ago 51% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTAS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green while VRSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was +3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +14.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.56%.
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2026.
VRSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2027.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Data Processing Services (-2.55% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| EXPO - CTAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| UNF - CTAS | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| VRSK - CTAS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| ARLO - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| EFX - CTAS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||