Advertisement
CTAS vs VRSK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has significantly outperformed Cintas Corporation (CTAS) on a year-to-date (YTD) basis, with returns around 20% compared to CTAS's 6%.
- CTAS exhibits stronger long-term stability, boasting 5-year returns exceeding 110% versus VRSK's under 1%.
- Both stocks trade near $175-180 levels, but CTAS commands a larger market capitalization of approximately $70 billion compared to VRSK's $23 billion.
- VRSK trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 27 versus CTAS's 37, alongside a lower beta of 0.82 indicating reduced volatility.
- Recent quarterly earnings have exceeded expectations for both, with VRSK's upcoming report adding momentum.
- Dividend yields are comparable at around 1%, appealing to income-focused investors in a volatile market.
Introduction
In the Industrials sector, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) offer recurring revenue models through essential services, making them attractive for investors pursuing defensive growth amid economic uncertainty. CTAS focuses on uniform rentals and facility management, while VRSK specializes in insurance risk analytics. This stock comparison evaluates their relative performance, valuation metrics, and market positioning in recent activity, aiding traders in assessing momentum shifts and long-term stability for portfolio allocation decisions.
CTAS Overview and Recent Performance
Cintas Corporation provides corporate uniforms, facility services, and first aid and safety products to businesses across North America and beyond, operating through a route-based distribution model that ensures recurring revenue. In recent market activity, CTAS shares have maintained stability around the mid-$170s within a 52-week range of $166 to $229. Sentiment has been supported by robust Q3 FY2026 results, including $2.84 billion in revenue and earnings per share (EPS) of $1.24, reflecting steady demand despite broader economic headwinds. However, mixed analyst views, including some lowered price targets, have tempered upside expectations amid high valuations.
VRSK Overview and Recent Performance
Verisk Analytics delivers data analytics, technology solutions, and risk assessment tools primarily to the global insurance industry, encompassing underwriting, claims processing, and catastrophe modeling. Recently, VRSK shares have traded near $178 in a 52-week range of $162 to $323, buoyed by year-to-date gains. Strong Q4 FY2025 performance with $778.8 million in revenue and EPS of $1.82, surpassing estimates, alongside partnerships such as with Roofr for insurance estimates, has driven positive sentiment. Anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings further influences recent price behavior.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top performers from over 351 AI trading bots that scan thousands of tickers, selecting only those excelling in current market conditions based on metrics like returns and consistency. The featured 25 bots showcase annualized returns ranging from 50% to over 130%, win rates of 55-70%, profit factors up to 7, and strategies spanning short-term (5-60 minutes) scalping to multi-day swings, often using AI/ML for semiconductors, industrials, and tech. Examples include bots targeting SOXL with 94% returns or diversified portfolios like NVDA and AMD. These automated systems offer varied risk profiles and timeframes, enabling traders to copy proven signals. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CTAS and VRSK thrive on subscription-like recurring revenues—CTAS via uniform rentals and services, VRSK through data analytics subscriptions—but differ in growth drivers: CTAS relies on organic expansion and mergers and acquisitions (M&A), while VRSK leverages insurance sector demand for AI-enhanced risk tools. Recent momentum favors VRSK with superior 1-year returns near 37% versus CTAS's 15%, though CTAS leads in multi-year compounding. Risk factors include economic sensitivity for CTAS's business services and regulatory or cyber exposures for VRSK's data operations. Sector exposure remains Industrials for both, yet market sentiment tilts toward VRSK's lower P/E and beta amid short-term stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor VRSK over CTAS, citing stronger trend consistency in recent months, superior YTD and 1-year performance, lower volatility via a sub-1 beta, and near-term catalysts like earnings reports and insurance risk demand. While CTAS offers proven long-term compounding, VRSK's relative positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance in the prevailing environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a Hold and VRSK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVRSK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VRSK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- VRSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -5.96% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was -3.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.98%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 09, 2026.
VRSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.74% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Data Processing Services (-2.96% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| CTAS | VRSK | CTAS / VRSK | |
| Capitalization | 68.4B | 22.8B | 300% |
| EBITDA | 3.05B | 1.69B | 180% |
| Gain YTD | -9.346 | -21.197 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.04 | 26.49 | 136% |
| Revenue | 11B | 3.1B | 355% |
| Total Cash | 183M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.92B | 4.63B | 63% |
CTAS | VRSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VRSK's Valuation (17) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTAS (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRSK (96) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's SMR Rating (6) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (23) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (63) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (89) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CTAS | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 57% | 10 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
CTAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| EXPO - CTAS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| UNF - CTAS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| VRSK - CTAS | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| ARLO - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.23% | ||
| EFX - CTAS | 46% Loosely correlated | -7.35% | ||
More | ||||