It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGRP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTAS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGRP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.97% price change this week, while SGRP (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.97%.
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2025.
SGRP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
CTAS | SGRP | CTAS / SGRP | |
Capitalization | 80.3B | 25.1M | 319,920% |
EBITDA | 2.86B | -3.6M | -79,527% |
Gain YTD | 9.644 | -45.876 | -21% |
P/E Ratio | 44.26 | 2.22 | 1,998% |
Revenue | 10.3B | 177M | 5,819% |
Total Cash | 264M | 13.9M | 1,899% |
Total Debt | 2.65B | 27.4M | 9,686% |
CTAS | SGRP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGRP's Valuation (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTAS (92) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SGRP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGRP (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew significantly faster than SGRP’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's SMR Rating (23) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGRP (96) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew significantly faster than SGRP’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SGRP (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to SGRP’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SGRP (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to SGRP’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS | SGRP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago58% | 2 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 9 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
EMD | 10.33 | 0.03 | +0.29% |
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund | |||
SPTI | 28.86 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
SPDR® Portfolio Intmdt Term Trs ETF | |||
JHHY | 26.13 | N/A | N/A |
JHancock High Yield ETF | |||
HYSA | 15.24 | -0.04 | -0.26% |
BondBloxx USD High Yld Bd Sect Rot ETF | |||
SVIX | 20.94 | -0.46 | -2.15% |
-1x Short VIX Futures ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS | 100% | +0.07% | ||
EXPO - CTAS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
VRSK - CTAS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
ARMK - CTAS | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
ARLO - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
UNF - CTAS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGRP and FLCX have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGRP and FLCX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SGRP | 100% | +1.94% | ||
FLCX - SGRP | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NL - SGRP | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.99% | ||
CTAS - SGRP | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
ABM - SGRP | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
UTI - SGRP | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.69% | ||
More |