Advertisement
CTAS vs ULS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a Hold and ULS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ULS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -5.49% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +5.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2025.
ULS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.83% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| CTAS | ULS | CTAS / ULS | |
| Capitalization | 75.6B | 15.6B | 485% |
| EBITDA | 2.92B | 657M | 445% |
| Gain YTD | 3.621 | 45.991 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.83 | 47.87 | 87% |
| Revenue | 10.6B | 2.95B | 359% |
| Total Cash | 138M | 272M | 51% |
| Total Debt | 2.68B | 805M | 332% |
CTAS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTAS | ULS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 6 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 5 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SDVD | 21.34 | 0.30 | +1.43% |
| FT Vest SMID Ris Div Ach Trg IncETF | |||
| NIXT | 26.39 | 0.35 | +1.34% |
| Research Affiliates Deletions ETF | |||
| GOOY | 13.68 | 0.06 | +0.44% |
| YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Stgy ETF | |||
| SCHZ | 23.57 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF™ | |||
| IRTR | 30.65 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| iShares LifePath Retirement ETF | |||
CTAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| EXPO - CTAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| VRSK - CTAS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ARLO - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| ARMK - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| UNF - CTAS | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
More | ||||
ULS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| ARMK - ULS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| RELX - ULS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CTAS - ULS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FA - ULS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| AZZ - ULS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
More | ||||