CTAS
Price
$200.59
Change
-$2.00 (-0.99%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
80.83B
Earnings call today
ULS
Price
$68.83
Change
+$0.30 (+0.44%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.83B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTAS vs ULS

Header iconCTAS vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts CTAS vs ULSBanner chart's image
Cintas
Price$200.59
Change-$2.00 (-0.99%)
Volume$2.99M
Capitalization80.83B
UL Solutions
Price$68.83
Change+$0.30 (+0.44%)
Volume$682.16K
Capitalization13.83B
CTAS vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTAS vs. ULS commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a Hold and ULS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CTAS: $200.59 vs. ULS: $68.83)
Brand notoriety: CTAS and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTAS: 143% vs. ULS: 77%
Market capitalization -- CTAS: $80.83B vs. ULS: $13.83B
CTAS [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $80.83B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $13.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the long-term than CTAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than CTAS.

Price Growth

CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTAS is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.60% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTAS($80.8B) has a higher market cap than ULS($13.8B). CTAS has higher P/E ratio than ULS: CTAS (45.59) vs ULS (42.49). ULS YTD gains are higher at: 38.869 vs. CTAS (10.425). CTAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.86B vs. ULS (657M). ULS (272M) and CTAS (264M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ULS has less debt than CTAS: ULS (805M) vs CTAS (2.65B). CTAS has higher revenues than ULS: CTAS (10.3B) vs ULS (2.95B).
CTASULSCTAS / ULS
Capitalization80.8B13.8B586%
EBITDA2.86B657M435%
Gain YTD10.42538.86927%
P/E Ratio45.5942.49107%
Revenue10.3B2.95B349%
Total Cash264M272M97%
Total Debt2.65B805M330%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTAS: Fundamental Ratings
CTAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTASULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
36%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLTI47.270.29
+0.62%
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Yr Trsy Bd ETF
SPAB25.880.05
+0.19%
SPDR® Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
FLCO21.900.03
+0.14%
Franklin Investment Grade Corporate ETF
LFEQ53.04-0.06
-0.11%
VanEck Lg/Flat Trend ETF
GDMA38.27-0.25
-0.64%
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF

CTAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTAS
1D Price
Change %
CTAS100%
-0.99%
EXPO - CTAS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
VRSK - CTAS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
DNB - CTAS
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ARMK - CTAS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
ARLO - CTAS
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
+0.44%
ARMK - ULS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
RELX - ULS
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
CTAS - ULS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
FA - ULS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
AZZ - ULS
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More