Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTCAX vs SLMCX
CTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CTCAX vs SLMCX
CTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTCAX vs. SLMCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTCAX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.9B vs. CTCAX (5.34B). CTCAX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTCAX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CTCAX (24 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). CTCAX (1.16) and SLMCX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CTCAX (6.00). CTCAX (6%) and SLMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. CTCAX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.81 vs. CTCAX (25.64). SLMCX (90.07) and CTCAX (88.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CTCAX | SLMCX | CTCAX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.695 | 56.324 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.34B | 28.9B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 58.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.84 | 133.25 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.60 | 90.07 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 515.88 | 310.94 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers