Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTCAX vs SLMCX
CTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CTCAX vs SLMCX
CTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTCAX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTCAX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 30.1B vs. CTCAX (5.75B). CTCAX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTCAX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CTCAX (24 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). CTCAX (1.16) and SLMCX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CTCAX (6.00). CTCAX (6%) and SLMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. CTCAX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 94.78 vs. CTCAX (52.47). CTCAX return over 5 years is better than : 109.80 vs. SLMCX (90.45).
| CTCAX | SLMCX | CTCAX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.051 | 53.676 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.75B | 30.1B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.47 | 94.78 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 130.98 | 135.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.80 | 90.45 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 622.82 | 351.55 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement