Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHCX vs SLMCX
CTHCX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs SLMCX
CTHCX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. SLMCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. CTHCX (5.18B). CTHCX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CTHCX (23 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). CTHCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CTHCX (6.00). CTHCX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 66.15 vs. CTHCX (24.73). SLMCX (79.67) and CTHCX (76.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CTHCX | SLMCX | CTHCX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.16 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.16 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.442 | 46.248 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.18B | 27.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.73 | 66.15 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.75 | 106.00 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.04 | 79.67 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 456.61 | 294.85 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement