Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHFX vs HBLCX
CTHFX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts CTHFX vs HBLCX
American Funds College 2030 529F1
Price$14.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.85B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
CTHFX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHFX vs. HBLCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHFX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. CTHFX (4.85B). CTHFX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: CTHFX (3.12) vs HBLCX (2.58). CTHFX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: CTHFX (13 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than CTHFX (0.75). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CTHFX (10.00). CTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: CTHFX (250) vs HBLCX (2000). CTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.91 vs. HBLCX (2.17). CTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.37 vs. HBLCX (14.26).
| CTHFX | HBLCX | CTHFX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.64 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.64 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.398 | 8.529 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.85B | 11.9B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 2.58 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.91 | 2.17 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | 19.10 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.37 | 14.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.99 | 37.95 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers