Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$16.90
Change+$0.13 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.42M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.48
Change+$0.46 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CTIGX (35.4M). CTIGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTIGX (2.37) vs FSMAX (0.44). CTIGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTIGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTIGX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.00 vs. FSMAX (23.59). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.51 vs. CTIGX (48.54).
| CTIGX | FSMAX | CTIGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.04 | 4,457% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.517 | 10.057 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.4M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 0.44 | 533% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.00 | 23.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.50 | 48.36 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.54 | 61.51 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.49 | - |