Ad is loading...
CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$12.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.28M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. CTIGX (28.3M). CTIGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTIGX (2.99) vs FSMAX (0.53). CTIGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTIGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTIGX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. FSMAX (1.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.14 vs. CTIGX (49.49).
| CTIGX | FSMAX | CTIGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.04 | 4,457% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.514 | -14.415 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.3M | 36.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 0.53 | 563% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 1.16 | 777% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.27 | 6.38 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.49 | 62.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...