Ad is loading...
CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$15.70
Change+$0.05 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.82M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. CTIGX (29.8M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CTIGX: FSMAX (1.10) vs CTIGX (0.00). CTIGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTIGX (5 years) vs FSMAX (13 years). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 231.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.94 vs. FSMAX (26.14). CTIGX return over 5 years is better than : 59.75 vs. FSMAX (48.39).
| CTIGX | FSMAX | CTIGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.527 | 3.994 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.8M | 40.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.94 | 26.14 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 21.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.75 | 48.39 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.18 | - |