Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CTIGX (51.9M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CTIGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CTIGX (0.00). CTIGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTIGX (7 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CTIGX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 192.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.32 vs. FSMAX (29.23). CTIGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.31 vs. FSMAX (33.65).
| CTIGX | FSMAX | CTIGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.04 | 4,143% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.645 | 15.427 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.9M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.32 | 29.23 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 122.30 | 73.83 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.31 | 33.65 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 153.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers