Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CTIGX (49.2M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CTIGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CTIGX (0.00). CTIGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTIGX (7 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CTIGX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 192.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.41 vs. FSMAX (24.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. CTIGX (35.45).
| CTIGX | FSMAX | CTIGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.04 | 4,143% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.068 | 15.913 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.2M | 43.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.41 | 24.38 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.74 | 63.28 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.45 | 39.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 139.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement