Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTLCX vs RLBAX
CTLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CTLCX vs RLBAX
CTLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTLCX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. CTLCX (4.72B). CTLCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CTLCX (2.05) vs RLBAX (1.12). CTLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CTLCX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). CTLCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. CTLCX (9.00). CTLCX (250) and RLBAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.83 vs. CTLCX (0.81). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. CTLCX (3.39).
| CTLCX | RLBAX | CTLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.520 | 7.935 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.72B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 1.12 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | 5.83 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.65 | 38.21 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.39 | 27.39 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.24 | 75.00 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement