CTMLF
Price
$8.79
Change
+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
FGETF
Price
$8.10
Change
-$1.35 (-14.29%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMLF vs FGETF

Header iconCTMLF vs FGETF Comparison
Open Charts CTMLF vs FGETFBanner chart's image
Corporate Travel Management
Price$8.79
Change+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.04B
FLIGHT CENTRE TRAVEL GROUP
Price$8.10
Change-$1.35 (-14.29%)
Volume$715
Capitalization3.06B
CTMLF vs FGETF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMLF vs. FGETF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMLF is a Hold and FGETF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMLF: $8.79 vs. FGETF: $8.10)
Brand notoriety: CTMLF and FGETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMLF: 283% vs. FGETF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTMLF: $2.04B vs. FGETF: $3.06B
CTMLF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $2.04B. FGETF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGETF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTMLF is a better buy in the long-term than FGETF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGETF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FGETF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTMLF and FGETF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTMLF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGETF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+3.18% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGETF($3.07B) has a higher market cap than CTMLF($2.04B). FGETF has higher P/E ratio than CTMLF: FGETF (97.81) vs CTMLF (92.59). CTMLF YTD gains are higher at: 11.219 vs. FGETF (-43.909). FGETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 437M vs. CTMLF (86.8M). FGETF has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. CTMLF (142M). CTMLF has less debt than FGETF: CTMLF (48.4M) vs FGETF (1.28B). FGETF has higher revenues than CTMLF: FGETF (2.57B) vs CTMLF (508M).
CTMLFFGETFCTMLF / FGETF
Capitalization2.04B3.07B67%
EBITDA86.8M437M20%
Gain YTD11.219-43.909-26%
P/E Ratio92.5997.8195%
Revenue508M2.57B20%
Total Cash142M1.36B10%
Total Debt48.4M1.28B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMLF vs FGETF: Fundamental Ratings
CTMLF
FGETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
7887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5783
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGETF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTMLF (97). This means that FGETF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

FGETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CTMLF (100). This means that FGETF’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FGETF (87). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FGETF (83). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGETF (90). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMLFFGETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIACX11.450.12
+1.06%
Columbia Acorn C
MGOTX8.700.08
+0.93%
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth C
CAAPX40.030.23
+0.58%
Ariel Appreciation Investor
MVCHX31.410.12
+0.38%
MFS Mid Cap Value R3
SEKCX18.040.05
+0.28%
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C

CTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMLF and HSWLF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMLF and HSWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMLF
1D Price
Change %
CTMLF100%
N/A
HSWLF - CTMLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOM - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
HWGG - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
DRTGF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
FGETF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGETF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGETF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGETF
1D Price
Change %
FGETF100%
N/A
HWGG - FGETF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
TCOM - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
CTMLF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDDFF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDDRF - FGETF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More