CTMLF
Price
$9.18
Change
+$0.40 (+4.56%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
GDDFF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMLF vs GDDFF

Header iconCTMLF vs GDDFF Comparison
Open Charts CTMLF vs GDDFFBanner chart's image
Corporate Travel Management
Price$9.18
Change+$0.40 (+4.56%)
Volume$600
Capitalization1.55B
Goodfood Mkt
Price$0.22
Change+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization20.43M
CTMLF vs GDDFF Comparison Chart in %
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GDDFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMLF vs. GDDFF commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMLF is a Buy and GDDFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMLF: $9.18 vs. GDDFF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: CTMLF and GDDFF are both not notable
CTMLF represents the Consumer Sundries, while GDDFF is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMLF: 52% vs. GDDFF: 72%
Market capitalization -- CTMLF: $1.56B vs. GDDFF: $20.84M
CTMLF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $1.56B. GDDFF’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $20.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $17.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGDDFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GDDFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GDDFF is a better buy in the long-term than CTMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GDDFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GDDFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTMLF is a better buy in the short-term than GDDFF.

Price Growth

CTMLF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GDDFF (@Personnel Services) price change was +8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.11%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +219.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.07% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-0.02% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTMLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than GDDFF($20.4M). CTMLF YTD gains are higher at: 16.114 vs. GDDFF (-23.505). CTMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 178M vs. GDDFF (6.21M). CTMLF has more cash in the bank: 135M vs. GDDFF (16.9M). CTMLF has less debt than GDDFF: CTMLF (38.8M) vs GDDFF (52.2M). CTMLF has higher revenues than GDDFF: CTMLF (708M) vs GDDFF (130M).
CTMLFGDDFFCTMLF / GDDFF
Capitalization1.55B20.4M7,603%
EBITDA178M6.21M2,865%
Gain YTD16.114-23.505-69%
P/E Ratio31.56N/A-
Revenue708M130M545%
Total Cash135M16.9M799%
Total Debt38.8M52.2M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMLF vs GDDFF: Fundamental Ratings
CTMLF
GDDFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4584
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
79100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GDDFF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMLF (96). This means that GDDFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

GDDFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTMLF (100). This means that GDDFF’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GDDFF (100). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to GDDFF’s over the last 12 months.

GDDFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CTMLF (54). This means that GDDFF’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDDFF (100). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDDFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMLFGDDFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GDDFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZMTBY2.36N/A
N/A
Zumtobel AG
MSLOF33.51N/A
N/A
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.
SFFFF71.94N/A
N/A
PEUGEOT INVEST
BKAMF14.33N/A
N/A
BROOKFIELD CORP.
VWFB11.24-0.01
-0.09%
VWF Bancorp, Inc.

CTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMLF and HSWLF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMLF and HSWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMLF
1D Price
Change %
CTMLF100%
N/A
HSWLF - CTMLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOM - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
HWGG - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
FGETF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GDDFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDDFF and FGETF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDDFF and FGETF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDDFF
1D Price
Change %
GDDFF100%
+6.13%
FGETF - GDDFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTMLF - GDDFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOM - GDDFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
DRTGF - GDDFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
FTDR - GDDFF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More