CTNR
Price
$5.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
14.84M
GZPZF
Price
$147.38
Change
+$8.38 (+6.03%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTNR vs GZPZF

Header iconCTNR vs GZPZF Comparison
Open Charts CTNR vs GZPZFBanner chart's image
Central Natural Resources
Price$5.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.20%)
Volume$200
Capitalization14.84M
Gaztransport Technigaz
Price$147.38
Change+$8.38 (+6.03%)
Volume$5.34K
Capitalization4.52B
CTNR vs GZPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTNR vs. GZPZF commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTNR is a Hold and GZPZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CTNR: $5.00 vs. GZPZF: $147.38)
Brand notoriety: CTNR and GZPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTNR: 42% vs. GZPZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTNR: $14.84M vs. GZPZF: $4.52B
CTNR [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $14.84M. GZPZF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTNR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGZPZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GZPZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GZPZF is a better buy in the long-term than CTNR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTNR’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTNR’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CTNR (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while GZPZF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.39% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GZPZF($4.52B) has a higher market cap than CTNR($14.8M). GZPZF YTD gains are higher at: 6.029 vs. CTNR (-0.990).
CTNRGZPZFCTNR / GZPZF
Capitalization14.8M4.52B0%
EBITDAN/A183M-
Gain YTD-0.9906.029-16%
P/E RatioN/A23.92-
RevenueN/A341M-
Total CashN/A253M-
Total DebtN/A6.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTNR vs GZPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CTNR
GZPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9848
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4917
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTNR's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GZPZF (50). This means that CTNR’s stock grew similarly to GZPZF’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CTNR (49). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CTNR’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTNR (100). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CTNR’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CTNR (77). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CTNR’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTNR (100). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CTNR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTNRGZPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
36%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMBCX11.80N/A
N/A
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
FEQZX14.00N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Hedged Equity Fund Z
GSELX68.99N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights Instl
CIRFX76.28-0.58
-0.75%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F
ARTMX35.20-0.36
-1.01%
Artisan Mid Cap Investor

CTNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTNR and ETOLF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTNR and ETOLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTNR
1D Price
Change %
CTNR100%
N/A
ETOLF - CTNR
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
FUGRF - CTNR
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZPZF - CTNR
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATONY - CTNR
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - CTNR
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

GZPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZF and TNRSF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZF and TNRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZF
1D Price
Change %
GZPZF100%
N/A
TNRSF - GZPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTK - GZPZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
CTNR - GZPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - GZPZF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
CHOLF - GZPZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More