Ad is loading...
CTNT
Price
$1.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
SVV
Price
$8.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

CTNT vs SVV

Header iconCTNT vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts CTNT vs SVVBanner chart's image
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service
Price$1.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$138.71K
CapitalizationN/A
Savers Value Village
Price$8.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$797.7K
CapitalizationN/A
CTNT vs SVV Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTNT vs. SVV commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTNT is a Hold and SVV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CTNT: $1.93 vs. SVV: $8.66)
Brand notoriety: CTNT and SVV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTNT: 89% vs. SVV: 117%
Market capitalization -- CTNT: $37.8M vs. SVV: $3.12B
CTNT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $37.8M. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the long-term than CTNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTNT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTNT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTNT is a better buy in the short-term than SVV.

Price Growth

CTNT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.08% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was -8.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.

SVV is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.50% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVV($3.12B) has a higher market cap than CTNT($37.8M). CTNT has higher P/E ratio than SVV: CTNT (142.00) vs SVV (56.82). SVV YTD gains are higher at: -50.173 vs. CTNT (-90.721). SVV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 202M vs. CTNT (1.56M). SVV has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. CTNT (433K). CTNT has less debt than SVV: CTNT (2.71M) vs SVV (1.29B). SVV has higher revenues than CTNT: SVV (1.5B) vs CTNT (38.3M).
CTNTSVVCTNT / SVV
Capitalization37.8M3.12B1%
EBITDA1.56M202M1%
Gain YTD-90.721-50.173181%
P/E Ratio142.0056.82250%
Revenue38.3M1.5B3%
Total Cash433K180M0%
Total Debt2.71M1.29B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTNTSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OLPX2.000.18
+9.89%
Olaplex Holdings
SNAL0.940.01
+0.82%
Snail
TAK13.330.04
+0.30%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
THG162.740.44
+0.27%
Hanover Insurance Group (The)
AZUL2.52-0.05
-1.95%
Azul SA

CTNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTNT and SVV have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTNT and SVV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTNT
1D Price
Change %
CTNT100%
+9.04%
SVV - CTNT
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
ARHS - CTNT
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
JZXN - CTNT
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
OLPX - CTNT
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.89%
NAAS - CTNT
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
+0.81%
RH - SVV
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
EYE - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
ONEW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+7.58%
PAG - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
LAD - SVV
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
More