LOW
Price
$214.34
Change
-$0.06 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
120.22B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVV
Price
$9.71
Change
+$0.07 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.48B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOW vs SVV

LOW vs SVV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOW vs. SVV commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOW is a StrongBuy and SVV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (LOW: $214.40 vs. SVV: $9.64)
Brand notoriety: LOW: Notable vs. SVV: Not notable
LOW represents the Home Improvement Chains, while SVV is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOW: 105% vs. SVV: 78%
Market capitalization -- LOW: $120.22B vs. SVV: $1.48B
LOW [@Home Improvement Chains] is valued at $120.22B. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $325.68B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $90.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LOW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than SVV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LOW and SVV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LOW (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а -2.63% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was -4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

SVV is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Improvement Chains (+2.76% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

@Specialty Stores (-1.60% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($120B) has a higher market cap than SVV($1.48B). SVV has higher P/E ratio than LOW: SVV (68.86) vs LOW (18.12). SVV YTD gains are higher at: 3.212 vs. LOW (-10.268). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. SVV (179M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 786M vs. SVV (61.6M). SVV has less debt than LOW: SVV (1.41B) vs LOW (42.5B). LOW has higher revenues than SVV: LOW (88.4B) vs SVV (1.71B).
LOWSVVLOW / SVV
Capitalization120B1.48B8,086%
EBITDA12.6B179M7,039%
Gain YTD-10.2683.212-320%
P/E Ratio18.1268.8626%
Revenue88.4B1.71B5,164%
Total Cash786M61.6M1,276%
Total Debt42.5B1.41B3,021%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOW: Fundamental Ratings
LOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOWSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAYM25.380.01
+0.04%
TrueShares S&P Autcll Defesv Inc ETF
BLUI25.63N/A
-0.01%
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
QQQY24.30-0.01
-0.04%
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Trgt 30 Wkly Dis ETF
PML7.50-0.05
-0.66%
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
BCDF30.16-0.35
-1.16%
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Dev ETF

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
-3.51%
HD - LOW
88%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
FND - LOW
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
HVT - LOW
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
CPRT - LOW
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
ASO - LOW
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with WSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then WSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
-5.02%
WSM - SVV
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
HVT - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
GPI - SVV
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
LOW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
HD - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
More