Investors seeking exposure to the healthcare real estate sector frequently encounter two prominent names: CareTrust REIT and Omega Healthcare Investors. Both are publicly traded REITs that own and lease skilled nursing facilities, assisted living centers, and other healthcare properties — yet their approaches to growth, leverage, and portfolio composition differ in ways that matter considerably for relative performance. This comparison is especially relevant for income-oriented investors, REIT specialists, and anyone evaluating how these two healthcare landlords stack up in an environment shaped by aging demographics, evolving regulatory frameworks, and shifting capital market conditions. By examining recent developments and current positioning, this article provides a clear, neutral assessment of where CTRE and OHI stand today.
CareTrust REIT, Inc. is a self-administered healthcare REIT that owns, acquires, and leases skilled nursing facilities, seniors housing, and other healthcare-related properties across the United States and, increasingly, the United Kingdom. The company operates primarily through long-term triple-net leases, a structure where tenants bear most property-level expenses including taxes, insurance, and maintenance.
In recent quarters, CTRE has distinguished itself through a rapid pace of external growth. During full-year 2025, the company deployed approximately $1.8 billion in new investments at a blended stabilized yield of 8.6%, representing a record year for capital deployment. This included a transformative acquisition of Care REIT plc, which brought roughly 134 UK care home properties into the portfolio and reduced U.S. skilled nursing concentration to approximately 49% of properties. The company ended 2025 with normalized FFO (Funds From Operations) of $1.76 per diluted share, reflecting a 17% year-over-year increase, and reported a $500 million investment pipeline heading into 2026. CTRE's balance sheet remains notably under-levered, with net debt-to-EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) at just 0.7x — well below the company's 4.0x–5.0x target range. With full availability on its $1.2 billion revolving credit facility and no debt maturities before 2028, CTRE carries substantial financial flexibility. Multiple analyst firms, including UBS, RBC Capital, and Jefferies, have initiated or maintained Buy/Outperform ratings on the stock in recent months.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. is one of the largest and most established healthcare REITs, with a portfolio spanning approximately 1,111 facilities heavily weighted toward skilled nursing and transitional care properties (roughly 62% of the portfolio), complemented by U.S. senior housing and UK care assets. Like CTRE, OHI derives the bulk of its revenue from long-term triple-net lease agreements with facility operators.
OHI delivered a robust 2025, generating $609 million in net income, or $1.94 per common share, alongside adjusted FFO (AFFO) of $3.10 per diluted share — an 8% increase over 2024. The company completed $1.1 billion in new investments across real estate acquisitions, loans, and joint venture interests, while simultaneously undertaking a significant balance sheet transformation. During the fourth quarter of 2025 alone, OHI repaid $1.27 billion in aggregate debt, reducing leverage to 3.51x — the lowest level in company history. The company also expanded its credit facility to $2.3 billion and entered into a new $2 billion ATM (At-the-Market) equity program. Management provided 2026 AFFO guidance of $3.15 to $3.25 per share, signaling continued confidence. On the operational front, operator EBITDAR (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization, and Rent) coverage improved to 1.57x, and occupancy trends continued to strengthen. However, OHI has navigated notable tenant headwinds, including the Genesis Healthcare Chapter 11 restructuring, which created uncertainty around recovery timelines, though rent and interest payments from that operator remained current throughout the process.
For traders and investors looking to navigate the complex dynamics between stocks like CTRE and OHI, technology is playing an increasingly central role. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of automated trading systems drawn from hundreds of AI-powered bots that trade across thousands of different tickers. Each bot is built with a distinct trading style, strategy, and timeframe — ranging from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches — and only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. Visitors can explore bots with varying historical performance statistics, risk profiles, and ticker coverage sets, providing a data-driven complement to traditional fundamental analysis. Whether you are seeking to automate part of your strategy or simply monitor which names AI algorithms currently favor, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer useful, timely perspective.
Business Model and Scale. Both companies operate as triple-net-lease healthcare REITs, but OHI is significantly larger, with 1,111 facilities versus CTRE's roughly 579 properties post-expansion. OHI's portfolio skews more heavily toward skilled nursing (62%), while CTRE's diversification push — especially its UK expansion — has meaningfully reduced concentration risk. CTRE's top five tenants represent approximately 56% of rental income, with Ensign Group alone accounting for roughly 25%, compared to OHI's broader operator base.
Growth Trajectory. CTRE has been the more aggressive grower in percentage terms, with normalized FFO rising 17% in 2025 and management guiding for approximately 9.4% FFO growth in 2026 (midpoint of $1.90–$1.95). OHI's growth has been steadier, with FAD (Funds Available for Distribution) rising 8.4% in 2025 and 2026 AFFO guidance implying roughly 3%–6% growth at the midpoint. CTRE appears to be in a higher-growth phase, partly enabled by its under-levered balance sheet and substantial equity issuance.
Balance Sheet and Risk. Here the contrast sharpens. CTRE carries net debt-to-EBITDA of just 0.7x, a figure almost unheard of in the REIT space and far below its own 4.0x–5.0x target. This implies significant untapped debt capacity. OHI, meanwhile, has been actively deleveraging and reached a historically low 3.51x ratio — a more conventional but still healthy level. OHI's operator risk profile requires closer monitoring: the Genesis Healthcare bankruptcy, while so far non-disruptive to rent payments, introduces uncertainty around ultimate recovery. CTRE has benefited from 100% contractual rent collection and a clean operator slate.
Dividend and Income. OHI's quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share offers a substantially higher dollar payout than CTRE's $0.335, and its indicated dividend yield has historically been among the highest in the healthcare REIT segment. However, OHI's higher FAD payout ratio (approximately 88%) leaves less margin for reinvestment or absorption of operator disruptions than CTRE's more conservative ~73% payout ratio. Income investors may favor OHI for current yield, while total-return-oriented investors may find CTRE's lower payout and higher retained cash flow appealing.
Market Sentiment. Both stocks enjoy broadly favorable institutional positioning. CTRE has drawn Buy ratings from several major firms, with average analyst price targets suggesting modest upside from current levels. Its put/call ratio has hovered around 0.26–0.33, indicating bullish options market sentiment. OHI has earned positive analyst commentary tied to its balance sheet improvements, though operator-related risks temper some enthusiasm. Both REITs benefit from secular tailwinds tied to aging demographics and constrained new supply of skilled nursing beds.
Based on observable technical and fundamental factors, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of CTRE in the current market environment. The combination of a sharply under-levered balance sheet (0.7x net debt-to-EBITDA), accelerating FFO growth in the high single to low double digits, a cleaner operator track record with 100% rent collection, and a sizable $500 million investment pipeline suggests a more favorable risk-reward profile in the near to intermediate term. CTRE's international diversification and aggressive but well-funded growth strategy provide a catalyst-rich backdrop that trend-following and momentum-oriented models tend to favor. OHI's strengths — scale, an attractive dividend, and improved leverage — are not to be dismissed, and income-focused bots may continue to find OHI compelling. However, the presence of ongoing operator restructuring risk and a higher payout ratio introduces variables that probabilistic models may treat as incremental uncertainty. As always, AI assessments reflect current data and trend signals, not guarantees, and conditions can shift as new information emerges.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTRE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOHI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OHI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTRE (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while OHI (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.76%.
CTRE is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
OHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| CTRE | OHI | CTRE / OHI | |
| Capitalization | 9.91B | 15.1B | 66% |
| EBITDA | 495M | 1.44B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | 18.373 | 17.578 | 105% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.54 | 18.02 | 147% |
| Revenue | 416M | 1.28B | 32% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 39M | - |
| Total Debt | 895M | 4.03B | 22% |
CTRE | OHI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OHI's Valuation (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTRE (88). This means that OHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTRE’s over the last 12 months.
OHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CTRE (8). This means that OHI’s stock grew similarly to CTRE’s over the last 12 months.
OHI's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CTRE (75). This means that OHI’s stock grew similarly to CTRE’s over the last 12 months.
OHI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CTRE (44). This means that OHI’s stock grew similarly to CTRE’s over the last 12 months.
CTRE's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as OHI (78). This means that CTRE’s stock grew similarly to OHI’s over the last 12 months.
| CTRE | OHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 66% | 11 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 8 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 50% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTRE has been closely correlated with OHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTRE jumps, then OHI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTRE | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| OHI - CTRE | 73% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| SBRA - CTRE | 70% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| LTC - CTRE | 69% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| WELL - CTRE | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| NHI - CTRE | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||