Ad is loading...
CTS
Price
$53.83
Change
+$0.65 (+1.22%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:13 PM (EDT)
81 days until earnings call
SANM
Price
$79.69
Change
+$0.16 (+0.20%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:36 PM (EDT)
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTS vs SANM

Header iconCTS vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts CTS vs SANMBanner chart's image
CTS
Price$53.83
Change+$0.65 (+1.22%)
Volume$179
CapitalizationN/A
Sanmina
Price$79.69
Change+$0.16 (+0.20%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
CTS vs SANM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTS vs. SANM commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Sell and SANM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (CTS: $53.18 vs. SANM: $79.52)
Brand notoriety: CTS and SANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTS: 101% vs. SANM: 52%
Market capitalization -- CTS: $1.6B vs. SANM: $4.35B
CTS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.6B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $88.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the long-term than SANM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the short-term than SANM.

Price Growth

CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

SANM is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.96% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANM($4.35B) has a higher market cap than CTS($1.6B). CTS has higher P/E ratio than SANM: CTS (27.41) vs SANM (20.34). SANM YTD gains are higher at: 54.799 vs. CTS (21.887). SANM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 471M vs. CTS (105M). SANM has more cash in the bank: 658M vs. CTS (94.9M). CTS has less debt than SANM: CTS (129M) vs SANM (317M). SANM has higher revenues than CTS: SANM (7.6B) vs CTS (513M).
CTSSANMCTS / SANM
Capitalization1.6B4.35B37%
EBITDA105M471M22%
Gain YTD21.88754.79940%
P/E Ratio27.4120.34135%
Revenue513M7.6B7%
Total Cash94.9M658M14%
Total Debt129M317M41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTS vs SANM: Fundamental Ratings
CTS
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7381
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1512
SMR RATING
1..100
6469
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTS's Valuation (49) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (56). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (15). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's SMR Rating (64) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (69). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (44). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTS (46). This means that SANM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTSSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIG46.350.64
+1.40%
ProShares Ultra Energy
AUSF44.070.61
+1.40%
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
PVAL39.300.40
+1.03%
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
RZC26.500.14
+0.53%
Reinsurance Group of America
THY22.710.01
+0.03%
Toews Agility Dynamic Tactical Inc ETF

CTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been loosely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTS
1D Price
Change %
CTS100%
+0.82%
KN - CTS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
LFUS - CTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
PLXS - CTS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
ROG - CTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
TTMI - CTS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More

SANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANM
1D Price
Change %
SANM100%
+2.50%
BHE - SANM
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
FLEX - SANM
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
PLXS - SANM
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
CTS - SANM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
LFUS - SANM
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More