CTSDF
Price
$4.32
Change
-$0.02 (-0.46%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
816.48M
EPAM
Price
$159.12
Change
+$1.09 (+0.69%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.95B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTSDF vs EPAM

Header iconCTSDF vs EPAM Comparison
Open Charts CTSDF vs EPAMBanner chart's image
Converge Technology Solutions
Price$4.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.46%)
Volume$3.45M
Capitalization816.48M
Epam Systems
Price$159.12
Change+$1.09 (+0.69%)
Volume$440.75K
Capitalization8.95B
CTSDF vs EPAM Comparison Chart
Loading...
EPAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTSDF vs. EPAM commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSDF is a Hold and EPAM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CTSDF: $4.32 vs. EPAM: $159.12)
Brand notoriety: CTSDF and EPAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTSDF: 8% vs. EPAM: 53%
Market capitalization -- CTSDF: $816.48M vs. EPAM: $8.95B
CTSDF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $816.48M. EPAM’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $8.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $216B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTSDF is a better buy in the long-term than EPAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EPAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CTSDF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was +8.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +7.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTSDF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

EPAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+7.33% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPAM($8.95B) has a higher market cap than CTSDF($816M). CTSDF YTD gains are higher at: 88.493 vs. EPAM (-31.948). EPAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 672M vs. CTSDF (-69.08M). EPAM has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CTSDF (142M). EPAM has less debt than CTSDF: EPAM (163M) vs CTSDF (256M). EPAM has higher revenues than CTSDF: EPAM (4.73B) vs CTSDF (2.59B).
CTSDFEPAMCTSDF / EPAM
Capitalization816M8.95B9%
EBITDA-69.08M672M-10%
Gain YTD88.493-31.948-277%
P/E RatioN/A20.16-
Revenue2.59B4.73B55%
Total Cash142M1.29B11%
Total Debt256M163M157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTSDF vs EPAM: Fundamental Ratings
CTSDF
EPAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
369
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
9460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9990
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTSDF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (67) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CTSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

CTSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CTSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

EPAM's SMR Rating (60) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTSDF (94) in the null industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

CTSDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as EPAM (65) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CTSDF’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.

EPAM's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CTSDF (99) in the null industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to CTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EPAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOVZ38.410.66
+1.75%
TrueShares Structured Outcome Nov ETF
BJAN46.100.29
+0.64%
Innovator US Equity Buff ETF™ Jan
EFG103.350.58
+0.56%
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
CCIF6.620.02
+0.30%
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
EMO46.06-0.14
-0.30%
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund

CTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTSDF and CXGEF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTSDF and CXGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTSDF
1D Price
Change %
CTSDF100%
N/A
CXGEF - CTSDF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBM - CTSDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
EPAM - CTSDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
FIS - CTSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
GIB - CTSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

EPAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been loosely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAM
1D Price
Change %
EPAM100%
+0.69%
GLOB - EPAM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
FLYW - EPAM
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
CTSH - EPAM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ACN - EPAM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
EXLS - EPAM
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More