Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTTIX vs NMBAX
CTTIX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts CTTIX vs NMBAX
Calvert Responsible Municipal Income I
Price$15.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets406.41M
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.37B
CTTIX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTTIX vs. NMBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTIX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 8.37B vs. CTTIX (406M). CTTIX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: CTTIX (3.32) vs NMBAX (3.08). CTTIX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: CTTIX (10 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX (0.64) and CTTIX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . CTTIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NMBAX (27.00). NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTTIX: NMBAX (2500) vs CTTIX (1000000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.65 vs. CTTIX (3.36). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.51 vs. CTTIX (3.79).
| CTTIX | NMBAX | CTTIX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.64 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.64 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.596 | 4.066 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 8.37B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 3.08 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 3.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | 12.95 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.79 | 5.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.71 | 18.02 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement