Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTTIX vs NMBAX
CTTIX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts CTTIX vs NMBAX
CTTIX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTTIX vs. NMBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTIX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.3B vs. CTTIX (429M). CTTIX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: CTTIX (3.52) vs NMBAX (3.27). CTTIX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: CTTIX (11 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). CTTIX (0.65) and NMBAX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . CTTIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTTIX: NMBAX (2500) vs CTTIX (1000000). CTTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.12 vs. NMBAX (-0.47). CTTIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.34 vs. NMBAX (1.02).
| CTTIX | NMBAX | CTTIX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.63 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.63 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.874 | -1.985 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 429M | 9.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 3.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.12 | -0.47 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.47 | 8.73 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.34 | 1.02 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.58 | 13.71 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement