CTUNF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
18.67M
GRCLF
Price
$4.88
Change
-$0.30 (-5.79%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTUNF vs GRCLF

Header iconCTUNF vs GRCLF Comparison
Open Charts CTUNF vs GRCLFBanner chart's image
Clean Seas Seafood
Price$0.08
Change+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization18.67M
Grain
Price$4.88
Change-$0.30 (-5.79%)
Volume$4.67K
Capitalization1.16B
CTUNF vs GRCLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTUNF vs. GRCLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTUNF is a StrongBuy and GRCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CTUNF: $0.08 vs. GRCLF: $4.88)
Brand notoriety: CTUNF and GRCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTUNF: 100% vs. GRCLF: 304%
Market capitalization -- CTUNF: $18.67M vs. GRCLF: $1.16B
CTUNF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $18.67M. GRCLF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTUNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTUNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRCLF is a better buy in the long-term than CTUNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTUNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRCLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTUNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GRCLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRCLF is a better buy in the short-term than CTUNF.

Price Growth

CTUNF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRCLF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.96% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRCLF($1.16B) has a higher market cap than CTUNF($18.7M). CTUNF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. GRCLF (11.794). GRCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 280M vs. CTUNF (-35.52M). GRCLF has higher revenues than CTUNF: GRCLF (7.2B) vs CTUNF (65.2M).
CTUNFGRCLFCTUNF / GRCLF
Capitalization18.7M1.16B2%
EBITDA-35.52M280M-13%
Gain YTD60.00011.794509%
P/E RatioN/A23.78-
Revenue65.2M7.2B1%
Total CashN/A596M-
Total DebtN/A940M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTUNF vs GRCLF: Fundamental Ratings
CTUNF
GRCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2885
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRCLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTUNF (65). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTUNF (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUNF (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

CTUNF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCLF (57). This means that CTUNF’s stock grew similarly to GRCLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTUNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCLF (100). This means that CTUNF’s stock grew similarly to GRCLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTUNFGRCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.790.29
+1.29%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X112544.8050001322.742200
+1.19%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL232.562.07
+0.90%
Apple
SPY648.922.29
+0.35%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA345.98-3.62
-1.04%
Tesla

CTUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTUNF and AGRO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTUNF and AGRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTUNF
1D Price
Change %
CTUNF100%
N/A
AGRO - CTUNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
DOLE - CTUNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
AGRI - CTUNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
DTCK - CTUNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
EDESY - CTUNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCLF and HERB have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCLF and HERB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCLF
1D Price
Change %
GRCLF100%
N/A
HERB - GRCLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+14.81%
GARPF - GRCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - GRCLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPY - GRCLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - GRCLF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More