Advertisement
CTVA vs KPLUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTVA is a Buy and KPLUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKPLUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CTVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KPLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KPLUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KPLUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -6.93% price change this week, while KPLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (+5.17% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CTVA | KPLUF | CTVA / KPLUF | |
| Capitalization | 43B | 2.46B | 1,749% |
| EBITDA | 3.46B | 635M | 545% |
| Gain YTD | 12.095 | 21.344 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.26 | 1266.31 | 2% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 3.63B | 474% |
| Total Cash | 2.14B | 594M | 360% |
| Total Debt | 3.63B | 0 | - |
CTVA | KPLUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTVA's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as KPLUF (95). This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to KPLUF’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KPLUF (78). This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than KPLUF’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as KPLUF (97). This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to KPLUF’s over the last 12 months.
KPLUF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CTVA (63). This means that KPLUF’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
KPLUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTVA (91). This means that KPLUF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
| CTVA | KPLUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDOC | 33.35 | 0.34 | +1.03% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Eq ETF | |||
| JHMM | 65.20 | 0.25 | +0.38% |
| JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| PQJA | 28.10 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY | |||
| BUFT | 24.16 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allctn Dfnsv ETF | |||
| GXC | 106.06 | -0.61 | -0.57% |
| SPDR® S&P China ETF | |||
KPLUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KPLUF and KPLUY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPLUF and KPLUY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KPLUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPLUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KPLUY - KPLUF | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KRLTF - KPLUF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ICL - KPLUF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| NTR - KPLUF | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CTVA - KPLUF | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||