Advertisement
CTVA vs MOO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTVA is a Hold and MOO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CTVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CTVA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -1.13% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (+2.45% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
CTVA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTVA | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SRS | 48.08 | 0.86 | +1.82% |
| ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | |||
| DISV | 33.68 | 0.32 | +0.96% |
| Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF | |||
| PQJL | 27.40 | 0.19 | +0.70% |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JULY | |||
| EMHY | 39.16 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF | |||
| LDSF | 19.03 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| First Trust Low Dur Strat Foc ETF | |||
CTVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | 100% | -1.58% | ||
| MOS - CTVA | 55% Loosely correlated | -13.31% | ||
| IPI - CTVA | 49% Loosely correlated | -7.04% | ||
| FMC - CTVA | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| NTR - CTVA | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| SMG - CTVA | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.