It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while SMG (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -4.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
SMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CTVA | SMG | CTVA / SMG | |
| Capitalization | 51.9B | 3.28B | 1,581% |
| EBITDA | 3.15B | 497M | 633% |
| Gain YTD | 16.252 | -1.287 | -1,263% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.93 | 16.21 | 259% |
| Revenue | 17.9B | 3.47B | 516% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 28.7M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.36B | 2.53B | 133% |
CTVA | SMG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMG's Valuation (26) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTVA (66) in the null industry. This means that SMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMG (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew significantly faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SMG (99) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SMG (59) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMG (99) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.
| CTVA | SMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 13 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| NTR - CTVA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| MOS - CTVA | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| IPI - CTVA | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| FMC - CTVA | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| CF - CTVA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMG has been loosely correlated with AVD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMG jumps, then AVD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMG | 100% | -3.93% | ||
| AVD - SMG | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CTVA - SMG | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NTR - SMG | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| BIOX - SMG | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
| FMC - SMG | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||