CTYP
Price
$5.30
Change
-$0.09 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
22.99M
MCHT
Price
$6.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTYP vs MCHT

Header iconCTYP vs MCHT Comparison
Open Charts CTYP vs MCHTBanner chart's image
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$5.30
Change-$0.09 (-1.67%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization22.99M
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial
Price$6.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$102
CapitalizationN/A
CTYP vs MCHT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTYP vs. MCHT commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTYP is a Hold and MCHT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CTYP: $5.30 vs. MCHT: $6.26)
Brand notoriety: CTYP and MCHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTYP: 247% vs. MCHT: 32%
Market capitalization -- CTYP: $22.99M vs. MCHT: $0
CTYP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.99M. MCHT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTYP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHT is a better buy in the long-term than CTYP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTYP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTYP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTYP is a better buy in the short-term than MCHT.

Price Growth

CTYP (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHT YTD gains are higher at: 1.387 vs. CTYP (-0.155).
CTYPMCHTCTYP / MCHT
Capitalization23MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.1551.387-11%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.13MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTYP vs MCHT: Fundamental Ratings
CTYP
MCHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6231
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8076
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (28). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (100). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (62). This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (80). This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (21). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTYPMCHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAXG.X3344.0076007.791992
+0.23%
PAX Gold cryptocurrency
BNX.X387.950070-3.585449
-0.92%
BinaryX [Old] cryptocurrency
BLZ.X0.032348-0.000606
-1.84%
Bluzelle cryptocurrency
KNC.X0.282339-0.015726
-5.28%
Kyber Network Crystal v2 cryptocurrency
GMX.X13.829888-1.086016
-7.28%
GMX cryptocurrency

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
MCHT - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - CTYP
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
DNSKF - CTYP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - CTYP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHT and CTYP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHT and CTYP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHT
1D Price
Change %
MCHT100%
N/A
CTYP - MCHT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RF - MCHT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
LSFG - MCHT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNBT - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
BKALF - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More