CTYP
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.45 (-6.67%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.22M
MCHT
Price
$7.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
24.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTYP vs MCHT

Header iconCTYP vs MCHT Comparison
Open Charts CTYP vs MCHTBanner chart's image
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$6.30
Change-$0.45 (-6.67%)
Volume$1.58K
Capitalization14.22M
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial
Price$7.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization24.39M
CTYP vs MCHT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTYP vs. MCHT commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTYP is a Hold and MCHT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTYP: $6.30 vs. MCHT: $7.30)
Brand notoriety: CTYP and MCHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTYP: 84% vs. MCHT: 35%
Market capitalization -- CTYP: $14.22M vs. MCHT: $24.39M
CTYP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.22M. MCHT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTYP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHT is a better buy in the long-term than CTYP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTYP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTYP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCHT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHT is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

CTYP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.67% price change this week, while MCHT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHT($24.4M) has a higher market cap than CTYP($14.2M). MCHT has higher P/E ratio than CTYP: MCHT (12.17) vs CTYP (8.63). CTYP (18.684) and MCHT (18.230) have similar YTD gains . MCHT has higher revenues than CTYP: MCHT (19.4M) vs CTYP (12.2M).
CTYPMCHTCTYP / MCHT
Capitalization14.2M24.4M58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.68418.230102%
P/E Ratio8.6312.1771%
Revenue12.2M19.4M63%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTYP vs MCHT: Fundamental Ratings
CTYP
MCHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
6832
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
913
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (38). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (100). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTYP (68). This means that MCHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (52). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHT (13). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTYPMCHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LANV2.350.06
+2.40%
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited
NVAX7.900.11
+1.41%
Novavax
AMGN283.643.54
+1.26%
Amgen
ESNT63.860.06
+0.09%
Essent Group Ltd
INTG17.42-0.58
-3.22%
Intergroup Corp

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
MCHT - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - CTYP
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
DNSKF - CTYP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - CTYP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHT and CTYP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHT and CTYP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHT
1D Price
Change %
MCHT100%
N/A
CTYP - MCHT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RF - MCHT
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
LSFG - MCHT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNBT - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
BKALF - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More