CTYP
Price
$6.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
15.04M
NACB
Price
$65.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
74.75M
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTYP vs NACB

Header iconCTYP vs NACB Comparison
Open Charts CTYP vs NACBBanner chart's image
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$6.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.04M
NATIONAL CAP BAN
Price$65.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$104
Capitalization74.75M
CTYP vs NACB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NACB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTYP vs. NACB commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTYP is a Buy and NACB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CTYP: $6.66 vs. NACB: $65.00)
Brand notoriety: CTYP and NACB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTYP: 5% vs. NACB: 49%
Market capitalization -- CTYP: $15.04M vs. NACB: $74.75M
CTYP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.04M. NACB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $74.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTYP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNACB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTYP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NACB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTYP is a better buy in the long-term than NACB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTYP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NACB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTYP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NACB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NACB is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

CTYP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.56% price change this week, while NACB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

NACB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NACB($74.8M) has a higher market cap than CTYP($15M). NACB has higher P/E ratio than CTYP: NACB (11.71) vs CTYP (9.12). CTYP YTD gains are higher at: 25.466 vs. NACB (4.157). NACB has higher revenues than CTYP: NACB (27.4M) vs CTYP (12.2M).
CTYPNACBCTYP / NACB
Capitalization15M74.8M20%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.4664.157613%
P/E Ratio9.1211.7178%
Revenue12.2M27.4M45%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTYP vs NACB: Fundamental Ratings
CTYP
NACB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9841
SMR RATING
1..100
6856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (51). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

NACB's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTYP (98). This means that NACB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

NACB's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (68). This means that NACB’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NACB (56). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to NACB’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NACB (54). This means that CTYP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NACB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTYPNACB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NACB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHHYF0.050.01
+12.61%
Charbone Hydrogen Corporation
PGPHF1415.1450.69
+3.72%
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
APTL60.89N/A
N/A
Alaska Power & Telephone Co.
SZHFF21.50N/A
N/A
Sojitz Corp.
SGLMF0.40N/A
N/A
Starhill Global Real Estate Investment Trust

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
MCHT - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - CTYP
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
DNSKF - CTYP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - CTYP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NACB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NACB and IBWC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACB and IBWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NACB
1D Price
Change %
NACB100%
N/A
IBWC - NACB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBH - NACB
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
CTYP - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBG - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
INFT - NACB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More