CULTF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.11M
MOOOF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.28 (-35.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.43M
Ad is loading...

CULTF vs MOOOF

Header iconCULTF vs MOOOF Comparison
Open Charts CULTF vs MOOOFBanner chart's image
Cult Food Science
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.85K
Capitalization6.11M
BETTERMOOD FOOD
Price$0.52
Change-$0.28 (-35.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization25.43M
CULTF vs MOOOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CULTF vs. MOOOF commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CULTF is a Hold and MOOOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CULTF: $0.02 vs. MOOOF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: CULTF and MOOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CULTF: 28% vs. MOOOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CULTF: $6.11M vs. MOOOF: $25.43M
CULTF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.11M. MOOOF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $25.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CULTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CULTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MOOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CULTF is a better buy in the long-term than MOOOF.

Price Growth

CULTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -15.18% price change this week, while MOOOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.67% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOOOF($25.4M) has a higher market cap than CULTF($6.11M). MOOOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CULTF (-30.147).
CULTFMOOOFCULTF / MOOOF
Capitalization6.11M25.4M24%
EBITDA-4.44MN/A-
Gain YTD-30.1470.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash940KN/A-
Total Debt47.7KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFUVX28.78-0.15
-0.52%
DFA US Large Cap Value III
LMBMX11.05-0.06
-0.54%
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity IS
CIRFX66.68-1.08
-1.59%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F
RLNCX39.44-1.27
-3.12%
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
JERTX10.48-0.36
-3.32%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate T

CULTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CULTF and TATYY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULTF and TATYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CULTF
1D Price
Change %
CULTF100%
-2.26%
TATYY - CULTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
GWLL - CULTF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDDF - CULTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOOOF - CULTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFCOF - CULTF
3%
Poorly correlated
-31.82%
More

MOOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MOOOF and BRCC have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOOOF and BRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOOOF
1D Price
Change %
MOOOF100%
N/A
BRCC - MOOOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
CULTF - MOOOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
GFCOF - MOOOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-31.82%
WEST - MOOOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
CELV - MOOOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More