Ad is loading...
CUT vs FMAT
CUT vs FMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs FMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.91
Change-$0.69 (-2.12%)
Volume$189
Net Assets50.54M
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$48.52
Change-$1.10 (-2.22%)
Volume$600
Net Assets543.86M
CUT vs FMAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. FMAT commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and FMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMAT has more net assets: 544M vs. CUT (50.5M). FMAT (2.967) and CUT (2.933) have matching annual dividend yield . CUT was incepted earlier than FMAT: CUT (17 years) vs FMAT (11 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.67). CUT has a higher turnover FMAT (9.00) vs FMAT (9.00).
| CUT | FMAT | CUT / FMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 2.933 | 2.967 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 544M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.08 | 798% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 9.00 | 356% |
| Yield | 3.00 | 1.61 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with WFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then WFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +1.35% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PTVE - CUT | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ALTR - CUT | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| CE - FMAT | 83% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| AVNT - FMAT | 81% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| EMN - FMAT | 77% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| DOW - FMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||