Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs FMAT
CUT vs FMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs FMAT
CUT vs FMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. FMAT commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and FMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMAT has more net assets: 613M vs. CUT (30.1M). FMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: FMAT (13.390) vs CUT (-6.065). CUT was incepted earlier than FMAT: CUT (19 years) vs FMAT (13 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.76). CUT has a higher turnover FMAT (6.00) vs FMAT (6.00).
| CUT | FMAT | CUT / FMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -6.065 | 13.390 | -45% |
| Net Assets | 30.1M | 613M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.08 | 905% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 6.00 | 433% |
| Yield | 2.59 | 1.43 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with PPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then PPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | +1.33% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| FUL - FMAT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| AVNT - FMAT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| EXP - FMAT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| RPM - FMAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||