| CUT | ICOP | CUT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | -2.777 | 10.898 | -25% |
| Net Assets | 30.6M | 429M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.47 | 162% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 37.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 2.56 | 1.81 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
| CUT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 19 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and LPX have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and LPX's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTAL - ICOP | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIO - ICOP | -2% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | -6% Poorly correlated | +4.01% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | -6% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||