CUT
Price
$29.69
Change
+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
31.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICOP
Price
$57.31
Change
-$0.57 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
498.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUT vs ICOP

CUT vs ICOP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) vs. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) provides diversified exposure to global timber, paper, and packaging companies, while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) concentrates on copper and metals mining equities.
  • CUT tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index with approximately 69 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.74%, emphasizing a broader natural resources theme.
  • ICOP follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index with 45 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.47%, offering targeted thematic exposure to copper demand drivers.
  • Structural differences include CUT’s cap on single-stock weights for diversification versus ICOP’s higher-conviction focus on revenue-derived copper miners.
  • Both funds are passively managed with physical replication, but ICOP exhibits greater sector concentration in materials while CUT spans consumer cyclical and real estate segments.
  • Relative positioning favors cost efficiency and thematic momentum considerations, with ICOP showing stronger potential alignment in current commodity cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking natural resources exposure often evaluate timber and copper-related ETFs as complementary or alternative strategies within the materials and commodities sectors. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) do not compete directly but represent distinct thematic approaches: one centered on forest products and packaging, the other on copper and metals mining. This comparison highlights structural differences, cost profiles, and positioning for investors evaluating sector rotation or commodity-linked opportunities in evolving market cycles.

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) Overview

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index. The index includes equity securities of companies engaged in forest ownership, timberland management, and production of timber-based finished products across developed and emerging markets. The fund holds approximately 69 securities with market-cap weighting and a 5% single-stock cap to maintain diversification and regulatory compliance. Top holdings typically include companies such as Smurfit Westrock, Weyerhaeuser, International Paper, Avery Dennison, and Packaging Corporation of America. Sector allocations emphasize consumer cyclical and basic materials, with smaller real estate exposure from timber real estate investment trusts. The expense ratio stands at 0.74%. The fund employs physical replication and rebalances according to the underlying index schedule.

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) Overview

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is a passively managed fund launched in 2023 that tracks the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. The index targets global equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining, screened for significant revenue exposure. The fund holds 45 securities with market-cap weighting. Top holdings commonly feature BHP Group, Anglo American, Grupo Mexico, Freeport-McMoRan, and Teck Resources. Nearly all assets (over 99%) allocate to the materials sector. The expense ratio is 0.47%. The fund uses physical replication of index constituents and rebalances per index methodology, providing concentrated thematic exposure to copper demand.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within broader natural resources and commodities themes influenced by global infrastructure spending, renewable energy transitions, and supply chain considerations. Timber demand ties to housing, packaging, and sustainable forestry trends, while copper exposure connects to electrification, data centers, and electric vehicle manufacturing. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate paths, industrial production cycles, and geopolitical supply risks. Capital flows into metals mining have reflected long-term demand outlooks, whereas timber equities respond to construction activity and paper market dynamics. Regulatory developments around environmental standards and mining permits add layers of sector-specific risk for both areas.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) has shown steadier behavior tied to housing and packaging earnings, with lower volatility from its diversified holdings across regions and sub-sectors. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has exhibited greater sensitivity to commodity price swings and mining sector rotation, reflecting its concentrated materials focus and higher beta characteristics. Relative positioning highlights ICOP’s alignment with copper demand catalysts versus CUT’s more defensive exposure within consumer cyclical segments. Both funds demonstrate passive tracking with index-driven rebalancing that supports long-term thematic consistency over short-term fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) presents a probabilistic edge in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, concentrated alignment with copper demand momentum, and efficient thematic positioning. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) offers solid diversification but carries higher costs and broader exposure that may dilute sector-specific upside. Investors should weigh these characteristics against individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CUT vs. ICOP commentary
Sep 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICOP has more net assets: 499M vs. CUT (31M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: ICOP (29.989) vs CUT (2.174). CUT was incepted earlier than ICOP: CUT (19 years) vs ICOP (3 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.76). CUT has a higher turnover ICOP (24.00) vs ICOP (24.00).
CUTICOPCUT / ICOP
Gain YTD2.17429.9897%
Net Assets31M499M6%
Total Expense Ratio0.760.47162%
Turnover26.0024.00108%
Yield2.411.54157%
Fund Existence19 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUTICOP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICOP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNT1.720.03
+1.78%
Senstar Technologies Corp
NOMD11.640.14
+1.22%
Nomad Foods Limited
ONCHU10.450.01
+0.10%
1RT Acquisition Corp
AGCC14.43-0.16
-1.10%
Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd
ALKS46.10-0.78
-1.66%
Alkermes plc

CUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUT
1D Price
Change %
CUT100%
+0.53%
CLW - CUT
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
SAP - CUT
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
SON - CUT
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
AVY - CUT
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
AMCR - CUT
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

ICOP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICOP
1D Price
Change %
ICOP100%
-0.98%
RIO - ICOP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MTAL - ICOP
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AAL - ICOP
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
TKO - ICOP
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
BHP - ICOP
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More