| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -0.367 | 18.808 | -2% |
| Net Assets | 30.5M | 1.16B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.56 | 136% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 17.00 | 153% |
| Yield | 2.41 | 2.09 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| DE - MOO | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| NTR - MOO | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||