| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | 2.548 | 12.268 | 21% |
| Net Assets | 33M | 975M | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.56 | 136% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 17.00 | 153% |
| Yield | 2.40 | 2.20 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 26 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | -2.16% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 55% Loosely correlated | -11.90% | ||
| BG - MOO | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| DE - MOO | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.64% | ||
More | ||||