Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs PYZ
CUT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs PYZ
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.67
Change+$0.16 (+0.52%)
Volume$152
Net Assets47.38M
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$91.70
Change+$0.33 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.3M
CUT vs PYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. PYZ commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and PYZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYZ has more net assets: 50.3M vs. CUT (47.4M). PYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: PYZ (5.590) vs CUT (-3.643). CUT was incepted earlier than PYZ: CUT (18 years) vs PYZ (19 years). PYZ (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). PYZ has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | PYZ | CUT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | -3.643 | 5.590 | -65% |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 50.3M | 94% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.60 | 123% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 68.00 | 47% |
| Yield | 3.17 | 1.13 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 82% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYZ has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PYZ jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| AVNT - PYZ | 85% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CE - PYZ | 84% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| EMN - PYZ | 80% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| MTUS - PYZ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| WLK - PYZ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||