Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs PYZ
CUT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs PYZ
CUT vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. PYZ commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and PYZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYZ has more net assets: 84M vs. CUT (30.1M). PYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: PYZ (21.345) vs CUT (-6.065). CUT was incepted earlier than PYZ: CUT (19 years) vs PYZ (20 years). PYZ (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.76). PYZ has a higher turnover CUT (26.00) vs CUT (26.00).
| CUT | PYZ | CUT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | -6.065 | 21.345 | -28% |
| Net Assets | 30.1M | 84M | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.60 | 127% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 69.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 2.59 | 0.52 | 497% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 16 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYZ has been closely correlated with MTUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PYZ jumps, then MTUS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | +2.13% | ||
| MTUS - PYZ | 79% Closely correlated | +4.09% | ||
| ASIX - PYZ | 74% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| PPG - PYZ | 70% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| WY - PYZ | 66% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| OEC - PYZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.01% | ||
More | ||||