CUT
Price
$29.69
Change
+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
31.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SETM
Price
$33.96
Change
-$0.33 (-0.96%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
619.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUT vs SETM

CUT vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) vs. Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) provides passive exposure to global timber and forest products companies through the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index, while Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) targets pure-play critical materials miners essential for energy transition via the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.
  • CUT maintains approximately 51 holdings with concentration in consumer cyclical and basic materials sectors; SETM holds 100–127 securities focused on mining equities in uranium, copper, lithium, and rare earths.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.76% for CUT and 0.65% for SETM, reflecting the thematic nature of both passive strategies.
  • CUT offers diversified timberland and wood-product exposure with geographic spread across developed and emerging markets, whereas SETM emphasizes upstream critical minerals supply with higher volatility tied to commodity cycles.
  • Both ETFs operate as non-leveraged, open-ended passive vehicles with semi-annual or index-driven rebalancing and moderate liquidity profiles suitable for long-term thematic allocation.
  • Relative positioning favors CUT for stable materials exposure and SETM for growth-oriented critical minerals demand driven by electrification and net-zero policies.

Introduction

Investors seeking thematic materials exposure often compare specialized equity ETFs that capture distinct segments of the natural resources universe. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) do not compete directly but instead represent complementary strategies within the broader materials sector. CUT delivers targeted access to timber and forest products, while SETM focuses on critical minerals required for energy infrastructure and storage. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural differences, sector allocations, and positioning amid evolving demand for sustainable resources and electrification.

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) Overview

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) seeks to track the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index, investing at least 90% of assets in index constituents, including American depositary receipts and global depositary receipts. The fund holds approximately 51 securities with top positions typically including Suzano S.A., Stora Enso Oyj, and SCA B, collectively accounting for roughly half of assets. Sector allocations concentrate in consumer cyclical (packaging and paper) and basic materials, with additional real estate and industrials exposure. The expense ratio is 0.76%. As a passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategy, the ETF applies capping rules to enhance diversification and rebalances according to index methodology. Distinguishing features include global developed- and emerging-market coverage of timberland owners and wood-product manufacturers.

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) Overview

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index and invests at least 80% of assets in securities of companies deriving significant revenue from mining, exploration, or production of critical materials including uranium, copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, manganese, rare earths, and silver. The ETF maintains 100–127 holdings with top positions such as NAC Kazatomprom JSC, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., and Cameco Corp. The expense ratio is 0.65%. As a passive thematic vehicle, SETM applies revenue-based selection criteria and market-cap weighting with semi-annual index rebalancing. Key features include pure-play exposure to upstream energy transition materials across developed and emerging markets, with notable allocations to Canada, the United States, and Australia.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The materials sector faces dual tailwinds from infrastructure expansion and the global shift toward cleaner energy systems. Timber demand benefits from housing recovery and sustainable packaging trends, while critical materials experience rising requirements for batteries, grid infrastructure, and nuclear power. Macro drivers include electrification policies, supply-chain diversification efforts, and commodity price cycles. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards introduce both opportunities and risks. Capital flows into energy transition themes have supported mining equities, though volatility remains elevated due to geopolitical tensions and fluctuating metal prices.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) has exhibited steadier behavior tied to housing and packaging demand, with lower volatility relative to pure commodity plays. Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) has shown stronger sensitivity to metal price movements and energy transition sentiment, resulting in wider performance dispersion during commodity rallies and pullbacks. In recent weeks and months, sector rotation toward electrification themes has influenced relative positioning, with SETM benefiting from uranium and copper momentum while CUT reflects more stable timber fundamentals. Both ETFs demonstrate moderate liquidity suitable for institutional and retail allocation, with SETM offering broader diversification across critical minerals and CUT providing concentrated yet capped timber exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like CUT and SETM can leverage this platform for efficient discovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) with moderate probability due to its lower expense ratio, broader holdings diversification across high-demand critical minerals, and alignment with sustained electrification and net-zero policy momentum. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) remains competitively positioned for investors prioritizing stable timber exposure and geographic breadth, though its higher cost and narrower thematic focus may limit relative appeal in the prevailing environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CUT vs. SETM commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and SETM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SETM has more net assets: 619M vs. CUT (31M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: SETM (17.306) vs CUT (2.174). CUT was incepted earlier than SETM: CUT (19 years) vs SETM (4 years). SETM (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.76). SETM has a higher turnover CUT (26.00) vs CUT (26.00).
CUTSETMCUT / SETM
Gain YTD2.17417.30613%
Net Assets31M619M5%
Total Expense Ratio0.760.65117%
Turnover26.0055.0047%
Yield2.411.31184%
Fund Existence19 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUTSETM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SETM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVYX33.520.22
+0.66%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value I
SGGIX95.790.09
+0.09%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Inst
GCMAX40.120.03
+0.07%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value A
MINFX43.66-0.20
-0.46%
MFS International Intrinsic Equity R2
FRVDX41.50-0.90
-2.12%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate M

CUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUT
1D Price
Change %
CUT100%
+0.53%
CLW - CUT
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
SAP - CUT
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
SON - CUT
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
AVY - CUT
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
AMCR - CUT
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More