Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVCFX vs RMEBX
CVCFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVCFX vs RMEBX
CVCFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVCFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVCFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CVCFX (435M). CVCFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVCFX (1.21) vs RMEBX (0.99). CVCFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVCFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CVCFX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CVCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVCFX: RMEBX (250) vs CVCFX (2500). CVCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. RMEBX (10.33). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. CVCFX (3.85).
| CVCFX | RMEBX | CVCFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.07 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.07 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.645 | 11.912 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 435M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | 10.33 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.92 | 37.21 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 37.20 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.68 | 93.11 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers