Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVCFX vs RMFCX
CVCFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CVCFX vs RMFCX
CVCFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVCFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVCFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CVCFX (434M). CVCFX (1.18) and RMFCX (1.15) have matching dividends . CVCFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CVCFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CVCFX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CVCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVCFX: RMFCX (250) vs CVCFX (2500). CVCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.75 vs. RMFCX (8.40). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.96 vs. CVCFX (4.82).
| CVCFX | RMFCX | CVCFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.91 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.91 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.148 | 9.992 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 434M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.75 | 8.40 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.89 | 36.11 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.82 | 34.96 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.29 | 92.03 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement