Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVCFX vs RMFCX
CVCFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CVCFX vs RMFCX
CVCFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVCFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVCFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CVCFX (416M). CVCFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CVCFX (1.26) vs RMFCX (1.19). CVCFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CVCFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CVCFX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CVCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVCFX: RMFCX (250) vs CVCFX (2500). CVCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. CVCFX (-1.53).
| CVCFX | RMFCX | CVCFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.91 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.91 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.354 | 5.845 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 416M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.29 | 10.10 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.87 | 34.65 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.53 | 33.85 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.08 | 91.46 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement