Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVCFX vs RWEBX
CVCFX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVCFX vs RWEBX
CVCFX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVCFX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVCFX is a Hold and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CVCFX (434M). CVCFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CVCFX (1.18) vs RWEBX (0.74). CVCFX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CVCFX (18 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). CVCFX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). CVCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RWEBX (32.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVCFX: RWEBX (250) vs CVCFX (2500). CVCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.75 vs. RWEBX (5.85). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.52 vs. CVCFX (4.82).
| CVCFX | RWEBX | CVCFX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.06 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.06 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.148 | 5.888 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 434M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.74 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.75 | 5.85 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.89 | 28.65 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.82 | 23.52 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.29 | 74.33 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement