Ad is loading...
CVE
Price
$15.84
Change
+$0.25 (+1.60%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
89 days until earnings call
TGS
Price
$27.41
Change
+$1.56 (+6.03%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
111 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CVE vs TGS

Header iconCVE vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts CVE vs TGSBanner chart's image
Cenovus Energy
Price$15.84
Change+$0.25 (+1.60%)
Volume$13.9M
CapitalizationN/A
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$27.41
Change+$1.56 (+6.03%)
Volume$372.82K
CapitalizationN/A
CVE vs TGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVE vs. TGS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVE is a Sell and TGS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CVE: $15.84 vs. TGS: $27.41)
Brand notoriety: CVE and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVE: 164% vs. TGS: 216%
Market capitalization -- CVE: $37.33B vs. TGS: $2.31B
CVE [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $37.33B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $2.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CVE and TGS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGS is a better buy in the short-term than CVE.

Price Growth

CVE (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -3.06% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +15.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVE is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

TGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-0.94% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVE($37.3B) has a higher market cap than TGS($2.31B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than CVE: TGS (241.29) vs CVE (12.82). TGS YTD gains are higher at: 81.643 vs. CVE (-4.865). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.7B vs. CVE (10.4B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. CVE (2.23B). CVE has less debt than TGS: CVE (9.95B) vs TGS (201B). TGS has higher revenues than CVE: TGS (139B) vs CVE (55.5B).
CVETGSCVE / TGS
Capitalization37.3B2.31B1,615%
EBITDA10.4B49.7B21%
Gain YTD-4.86581.643-6%
P/E Ratio12.82241.295%
Revenue55.5B139B40%
Total Cash2.23B164B1%
Total Debt9.95B201B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVE vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
CVE
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
463
SMR RATING
1..100
6065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVE's Valuation (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (86) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVE (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVE’s over the last 12 months.

CVE's SMR Rating (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (65) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVE (82) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVE’s over the last 12 months.

CVE's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (99) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVETGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSGEX14.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
BEGRX17.39-0.02
-0.11%
Franklin Mutual Beacon Z
LSVGX15.27-0.05
-0.33%
LSV Global Value Institutional
FAUFX46.50-0.23
-0.49%
Fidelity Advisor Utilities M
KINAX95.64-1.85
-1.90%
Kinetics Internet Adv A

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
+6.03%
YPF - TGS
76%
Closely correlated
+4.37%
EC - TGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+5.03%
E - TGS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
EQNR - TGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
CVE - TGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More