CVE
Price
$25.16
Change
-$0.44 (-1.72%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
47.02B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGS
Price
$31.60
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVE vs TGS

CVE vs TGS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVE vs. TGS commentary
Jun 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVE is a Hold and TGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 21, 2026
Stock price -- (CVE: $25.16 vs. TGS: $31.60)
Brand notoriety: CVE and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVE: 126% vs. TGS: 76%
Market capitalization -- CVE: $47.02B vs. TGS: $4.76B
CVE [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $47.02B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $571.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $105.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CVE and TGS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGS is a better buy in the short-term than CVE.

Price Growth

CVE (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -11.66% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was -5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -7.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

TGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-7.95% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVE($47B) has a higher market cap than TGS($4.76B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than CVE: TGS (15.59) vs CVE (14.03). CVE YTD gains are higher at: 48.700 vs. TGS (1.640). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01T vs. CVE (11.5B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 1.81T vs. CVE (2.58B). CVE has less debt than TGS: CVE (13.8B) vs TGS (1.57T). TGS has higher revenues than CVE: TGS (1.76T) vs CVE (51.9B).
CVETGSCVE / TGS
Capitalization47B4.76B988%
EBITDA11.5B1.01T1%
Gain YTD48.7001.6402,969%
P/E Ratio14.0315.5990%
Revenue51.9B1.76T3%
Total Cash2.58B1.81T0%
Total Debt13.8B1.57T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVE vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
CVE
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5635
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4019
SMR RATING
1..100
5850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4635
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVE's Valuation (38) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (44) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as CVE (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's SMR Rating (50) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as CVE (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.

CVE's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (52) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as CVE (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVETGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTHF52.332.34
+4.67%
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
PCGG11.050.19
+1.75%
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
TQQY13.090.11
+0.82%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
RSPH31.510.08
+0.25%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF
VFH131.44-0.96
-0.73%
Vanguard Financials ETF

CVE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVE has been closely correlated with SU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVE jumps, then SU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVE
1D Price
Change %
CVE100%
-1.72%
SU - CVE
82%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
CRGY - CVE
78%
Closely correlated
-3.15%
IMO - CVE
72%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
EQNR - CVE
69%
Closely correlated
-4.09%
XOM - CVE
68%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
-0.03%
YPF - TGS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
CRGY - TGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
EC - TGS
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.81%
PBR - TGS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
CVE - TGS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More