Advertisement
CVE vs TGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVE is a StrongBuy and TGS is a StrongBuy.
CVE in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026
CVE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 28 cases where CVE's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CVE's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CVE advanced for three days, in 269 of 350 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 226 of 291 cases where CVE Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 78%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CVE as a result. In 61 of 90 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CVE turned negative on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 56%.
CVE moved below its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CVE crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CVE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 31, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 49 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.480) is normal, around the industry mean (1.508). P/E Ratio (7.625) is within average values for comparable stocks, (10.200). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.110) is also within normal values, averaging (1.088). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.053) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.435) is also within normal values, averaging (3.764).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CVE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
TGS's RSI Oscillator is sitting in oversold zone for 4 days
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.01% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TGS advanced for three days, in 263 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
TGS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 26, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on TGS as a result. In 74 of 93 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for TGS turned negative on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 54 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TGS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for TGS entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 3 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: TGS's P/B Ratio (0.001) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (1.508). TGS has a moderately low P/E Ratio (0.006) as compared to the industry average of (10.200). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.050) is also within normal values, averaging (1.088). TGS's Dividend Yield (0.176) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.053). P/S Ratio (3.584) is also within normal values, averaging (3.764).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 31, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. TGS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
CVE | TGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TGS's Valuation (3) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVE (49) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVE’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (39) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (45) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (76) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TGS (97) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CVE’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.
| CVE | TGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 23 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CVE (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +0.07% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was -8.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVE is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2027.
TGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 09, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Integrated Oil (-0.98% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
Advertisement
CVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVE has been closely correlated with SU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVE jumps, then SU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | 100% | +2.67% | ||
| SU - CVE | 82% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| IMO - CVE | 82% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| CRGY - CVE | 78% Closely correlated | +4.22% | ||
| EQNR - CVE | 75% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| BP - CVE | 74% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||
TGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGS | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| YPF - TGS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| PBR - TGS | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| CVE - TGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| CRGY - TGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.22% | ||
| SHEL - TGS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QVML | 45.21 | 0.47 | +1.06% |
| Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) | |||
| RCTR | 30.30 | 0.23 | +0.76% |
| First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) | |||
| EFR | 10.27 | 0.02 | +0.20% |
| Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Fund | |||
| RCGE | 31.09 | -0.06 | -0.19% |
| RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) | |||
| AMPU | 1.38 | -0.22 | -13.48% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMPX ETF (AMPU) | |||