It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RGP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVEO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.47% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.83%.
RGP is expected to report earnings on Jan 01, 2025.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
CVEO | RGP | CVEO / RGP | |
Capitalization | 396M | 441M | 90% |
EBITDA | 129M | 46.1M | 280% |
Gain YTD | 6.222 | -36.869 | -17% |
P/E Ratio | 13.44 | 16.42 | 82% |
Revenue | 701M | 705M | 99% |
Total Cash | 3.32M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 74.8M | 16.5M | 453% |
CVEO | RGP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGP's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CVEO (21) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to CVEO’s over the last 12 months.
CVEO's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (100) in the null industry. This means that CVEO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.
CVEO's SMR Rating (78) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGP (86) in the null industry. This means that CVEO’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.
CVEO's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGP (63) in the null industry. This means that CVEO’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.
CVEO's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGP (24) in the null industry. This means that CVEO’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.
CVEO | RGP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago68% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago75% | 10 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago68% | 20 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVEO has been loosely correlated with ARLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVEO jumps, then ARLO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CVEO | 100% | -0.68% | ||
ARLO - CVEO | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
ALLE - CVEO | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
UNF - CVEO | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
GHC - CVEO | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
RGP - CVEO | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FORR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FORR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RGP | 100% | +0.71% | ||
FORR - RGP | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
GHC - RGP | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
CRAI - RGP | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
CASS - RGP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
UNF - RGP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More |