Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVFCX vs RMEBX
CVFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVFCX vs RMEBX
CVFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVFCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CVFCX (421M). CVFCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVFCX (1.94) vs RMEBX (1.00). CVFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVFCX (21 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVFCX (0.87). CVFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVFCX: RMEBX (250) vs CVFCX (2500). CVFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. RMEBX (7.85). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. CVFCX (8.31).
| CVFCX | RMEBX | CVFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.07 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.449 | 8.210 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 421M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.00 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.32 | 7.85 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.35 | 30.81 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.31 | 35.62 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.34 | 87.48 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement