Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVISX vs KGGAX
CVISX vs KGGAX Comparison
Open Charts CVISX vs KGGAX
CVISX vs KGGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVISX vs. KGGAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVISX is a Hold and KGGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGGAX has more cash in the bank: 3.6B vs. CVISX (394M). KGGAX pays higher dividends than CVISX: KGGAX (4.88) vs CVISX (3.42). CVISX was incepted earlier than KGGAX: CVISX (12 years) vs KGGAX (13 years). CVISX (1.40) is less costly to investors than KGGAX (1.26). CVISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. KGGAX (56.00). KGGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVISX: KGGAX (3000) vs CVISX (5000). CVISX (16.17) and KGGAX (16.15) have marching annual gain over last year. CVISX return over 5 years is better than : 73.57 vs. KGGAX (38.88).
| CVISX | KGGAX | CVISX / KGGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.26 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.456 | 12.148 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 394M | 3.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 4.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.17 | 16.15 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.25 | 72.60 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.57 | 38.88 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.07 | 140.41 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement