Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVKFX vs RMEBX
CVKFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVKFX vs RMEBX
CVKFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CVKFX (418M). CVKFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVKFX (2.21) vs RMEBX (1.00). CVKFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVKFX (5 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVKFX (0.53). CVKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). CVKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CVKFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). CVKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.63 vs. RMEBX (9.42).
| CVKFX | RMEBX | CVKFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.648 | 9.178 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 418M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.00 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.63 | 9.42 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.75 | 35.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 36.07 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement