Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVMIX vs RNWHX
CVMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CVMIX vs RNWHX
CVMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVMIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CVMIX (1.75B). CVMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CVMIX (1.73) vs RNWHX (1.15). CVMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CVMIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). CVMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CVMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVMIX: RNWHX (250) vs CVMIX (1000000). CVMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.03 vs. RNWHX (26.71). CVMIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. RNWHX (15.62).
| CVMIX | RNWHX | CVMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.317 | 15.164 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 90.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.15 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.03 | 26.71 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.83 | 52.63 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.15 | 15.62 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 197.14 | 125.47 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers