Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value Inst
Price$9.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.33M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CVQZX (175M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVQZX (1.52) vs RMEBX (1.11). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVQZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVQZX (0.96). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMEBX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. CVQZX (1.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. CVQZX (16.20).
| CVQZX | RMEBX | CVQZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.351 | 10.612 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.11 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.63 | 7.63 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.63 | 22.19 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.20 | 53.85 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.22 | 77.43 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement