Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CVQZX (224M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVQZX (1.19) vs RMEBX (0.99). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVQZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVQZX (0.94). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMEBX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). CVQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.00 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. CVQZX (5.59).
| CVQZX | RMEBX | CVQZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.591 | 10.367 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.00 | 9.03 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.38 | 38.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.59 | 35.75 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.23 | 90.55 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement