Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CVQZX (198M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVQZX (1.26) vs RMEBX (1.04). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVQZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVQZX (0.94). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMEBX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). CVQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.91 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. CVQZX (-2.08).
| CVQZX | RMEBX | CVQZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.455 | 5.801 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.91 | 9.98 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.47 | 34.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.08 | 32.93 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.43 | 89.84 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement