Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CVQZX (221M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVQZX (1.17) vs RMEBX (0.99). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVQZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVQZX (0.94). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMEBX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). CVQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. CVQZX (4.05).
| CVQZX | RMEBX | CVQZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.205 | 8.448 | 287% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.11 | 4.65 | 368% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.89 | 34.88 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 34.68 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.29 | 92.45 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers