Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMFCX
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value Inst
Price$9.39
Change-$0.05 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.54M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CVQZX (175M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CVQZX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.21). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CVQZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CVQZX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMFCX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. CVQZX (-3.49). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. CVQZX (12.62).
| CVQZX | RMFCX | CVQZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.91 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.152 | 12.783 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.49 | 6.00 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.34 | 27.94 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.62 | 52.67 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.25 | 84.73 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers