Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMFCX
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMFCX
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CVQZX (198M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CVQZX (1.26) vs RMFCX (1.19). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CVQZX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CVQZX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMFCX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). CVQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.91 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. CVQZX (-2.08).
| CVQZX | RMFCX | CVQZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.91 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.455 | 5.845 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.91 | 10.10 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.47 | 34.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.08 | 33.85 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.43 | 91.46 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers