Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs DGFAX
CWGCX vs DGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs DGFAX
CWGCX vs DGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. DGFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and DGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. DGFAX (875M). DGFAX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: DGFAX (0.75) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than DGFAX: CWGCX (26 years) vs DGFAX (22 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than DGFAX (0.95). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. DGFAX (27.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGFAX: CWGCX (250) vs DGFAX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. DGFAX (-3.12). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. DGFAX (12.97).
| CWGCX | DGFAX | CWGCX / DGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.95 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.95 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | -1.626 | -950% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 875M | 18,057% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | -3.12 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 38.36 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 12.97 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | 78.02 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers