Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs ERBCX
CWGCX vs ERBCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs ERBCX
CWGCX vs ERBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. ERBCX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and ERBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. ERBCX (580M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: CWGCX (0.75) vs ERBCX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than ERBCX: CWGCX (25 years) vs ERBCX (16 years). ERBCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBCX: CWGCX (250) vs ERBCX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. ERBCX (3.11). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.16 vs. ERBCX (-6.61).
| CWGCX | ERBCX | CWGCX / ERBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.87 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.88 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.567 | 8.824 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 580M | 27,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 3.11 | 469% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.04 | 16.53 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.16 | -6.61 | -411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | 44.98 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement