Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs ERBCX
CWGCX vs ERBCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs ERBCX
CWGCX vs ERBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. ERBCX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and ERBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ERBCX (601M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: CWGCX (0.71) vs ERBCX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than ERBCX: CWGCX (25 years) vs ERBCX (16 years). ERBCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBCX: CWGCX (250) vs ERBCX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. ERBCX (-0.88). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.02 vs. ERBCX (-6.02).
| CWGCX | ERBCX | CWGCX / ERBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.87 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.88 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.097 | 8.145 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 601M | 26,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.98 | -0.88 | -1,246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.56 | 11.30 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.02 | -6.02 | -449% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.58 | 33.72 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement