Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs ERBCX
CWGCX vs ERBCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs ERBCX
CWGCX vs ERBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. ERBCX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and ERBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ERBCX (587M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: CWGCX (0.72) vs ERBCX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than ERBCX: CWGCX (25 years) vs ERBCX (16 years). ERBCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBCX: CWGCX (250) vs ERBCX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. ERBCX (2.06). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.88 vs. ERBCX (-3.96).
| CWGCX | ERBCX | CWGCX / ERBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.87 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.88 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.310 | 12.330 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 587M | 26,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 2.06 | 687% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.65 | 19.14 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.88 | -3.96 | -754% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.68 | 37.19 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement